کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5665299 1407741 2017 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Calcineurin inhibitors versus cyclophosphamide for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 clinical trials
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مهار کننده های کالسینورین در مقایسه با سیکلوفسفامید برای نفروپاتی غشایی ایدئوپاتیک: بررسی منظم و متاآنالیز 21 آزمایش بالینی
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری ایمنی شناسی و میکروب شناسی ایمونولوژی
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) with cyclophosphamide (CTX) in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN).MethodsA literature search was carried out using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and three Chinese databases (WanFang Data, Chongqing VIP and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from inception through June 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of CNIs with CTX in IMN patients were included. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of each study. Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.3 software. Odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and data were pooled with a random-effect model.ResultsA total of twenty-one studies involving 1187 patients were included in this study. CNIs had significant merits in increasing total remission (CSA vs CTX: OR 1.91, 95%CI 1.09 to 3.34, P = 0.02; TAC vs CTX: OR 2.95, 95%CI 1.84 to 4.75, P < 0.00001), elevating serum albumin (CSA vs CTX: MD 3.83, 95%CI 2.49 to 5.16, P < 0.00001; TAC vs CTX: OR 8.57, 95%CI 5.08 to 12.07, P < 0.00001) and reducing proteinuria (CSA vs CTX: MD − 0.73, 95%CI − 1.25 to − 0.22, P = 0.005; TAC vs CTX: MD − 1.7, 95%CI − 2.29 to − 1.10, P < 0.00001) compared with CTX after 6 months of treatment. However, no similar results were found after 12 months. Moreover, CSA had a higher relapse rate than CTX (OR 3.89, 95%CI 1.53 to 9.92, P = 0.004), which was not found in the comparison of TAC and CTX. The incidences of leukopenia, alopecia and liver damage were higher in the CTX group (OR (95%CI): 0.23 (0.09 to 0.59), 0.10 (0.04 to 0.24), and 0.36 (0.19 to 0.69, respectively), whereas the incidences of hirsutism, gingival hyperplasia, worsening hypertension and hyperuricemia were higher in the CSA group (OR (95%CI): 8.64 (1.97 to 37.79, 4.44 (1.09 to 17.99), 4.59 (1.43 to 14.82) and 9.05 (1.53 to 53.36), respectively).ConclusionsOur systematic review demonstrates that CNIs are promising alternatives to CTX for IMN patients, primarily due to their better short-term efficacy and safety. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to further evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of CNIs and CTX.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Autoimmunity Reviews - Volume 16, Issue 2, February 2017, Pages 136-145
نویسندگان
, , , ,