کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5731064 1611469 2017 14 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Single-incision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
لاپاروسکوپی یک برش در مقابل لاپاروسکوپی استاندارد برای عمل جراحی کولورکتال: بررسی منظم و متاآنالیز
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی عمل جراحی
چکیده انگلیسی


- Colorectal SILS is a feasible and safe technique, yielding very good short-term outcomes that are comparable to multi-port laparoscopic surgery.
- The short-terms oncological results of SILS for colorectal cancer were satisfactory but currently data about the long-term survival rates and local recurrence are scarce.
- To date, SILS does not offer any objective remarkable advantage to recommend its widespread use instead of standard LCS.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate if the advantages of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) to perform a colorectal resection justify a broad application of this approach. A total of 32 studies including 3863 patients, comparing colorectal procedures performed with SILS or multi-port laparoscopy (LCS) were analyzed after a systematic review. Colorectal SILS had comparable outcomes to multi-port LCS in terms of operating time (P = 0.44), conversion rate (2.0% vs 3.0%; P = 0.52), reoperations (1.1% vs 1.7%; P = 0.26), postoperative complications (14.4% vs 13.6%; P = 0.10) and mortality (0.24% vs 0.68%; P = 0.46). Mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in CSILS group, (MD = −0.88 [−1.33, −0,42], 95% CI, P = 0.0001), but heterogeneity was found (I2 = 65%; P < 0.0001). The oncological results of SILS for colorectal cancer were satisfactory, as demonstrated by similar average lymph node retrieval (P = 0.72) and adequate resection margins (negative in all cases) compared to those obtained with LCS. Nevertheless, there are currently no available long-term follow-up data comparing the survival rates and local recurrence between both approaches. Insufficient data were available for evaluating long-term incisional hernia rates, and other potential benefits associated with colorectal SILS (cosmesis, postoperative pain) remain to be objectively proved. To date there is insufficient evidence to recommend widespread use of SILS instead of LCS for colorectal surgery.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The American Journal of Surgery - Volume 214, Issue 1, July 2017, Pages 127-140
نویسندگان
, , , ,