کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5815193 1556644 2013 13 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Invited reviewDefining “epileptogenesis” and identifying “antiepileptogenic targets” in animal models of acquired temporal lobe epilepsy is not as simple as it might seem
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی علوم اعصاب رفتاری
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Invited reviewDefining “epileptogenesis” and identifying “antiepileptogenic targets” in animal models of acquired temporal lobe epilepsy is not as simple as it might seem
چکیده انگلیسی

The “latent period” between brain injury and clinical epilepsy is widely regarded to be a seizure-free, pre-epileptic state during which a time-consuming cascade of molecular events and structural changes gradually mediates the process of “epileptogenesis.” The concept of the “latent period” as the duration of “epileptogenesis” implies that epilepsy is not an immediate result of brain injury, and that anti-epileptogenic strategies need to target delayed secondary mechanisms that develop sometime after an initial injury. However, depth recordings made directly from the dentate granule cell layers in awake rats after convulsive status epilepticus-induced injury have now shown that whenever perforant pathway stimulation-induced status epilepticus produces extensive hilar neuron loss and entorhinal cortical injury, hyperexcitable granule cells immediately generate spontaneous epileptiform discharges and focal or generalized behavioral seizures. This indicates that hippocampal injury caused by convulsive status epilepticus is immediately epileptogenic and that hippocampal epileptogenesis requires no delayed secondary mechanism. When latent periods do exist after injury, we hypothesize that less extensive cell loss causes an extended period during which initially subclinical focal seizures gradually increase in duration to produce the first clinical seizure. Thus, the “latent period” is suggested to be a state of “epileptic maturation,” rather than a prolonged period of “epileptogenesis,” and therefore the antiepileptogenic therapeutic window may only remain open during the first week after injury, when some delayed cell death may still be preventable. Following the perhaps unavoidable development of the first focal seizures (“epileptogenesis”), the most fruitful therapeutic strategy may be to interrupt the process of “epileptic maturation,” thereby keeping focal seizures focal.This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'New Targets and Approaches to the Treatment of Epilepsy'.

► “Epileptogenesis” and “epileptic maturation” defined. ► Animal models of acquired temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. ► Spontaneous granule cell layer events in epileptic rats. ► Hippocampal c-Fos expression after spontaneous epileptic seizures. ► “Keeping focal seizures focal” as a primary therapeutic strategy.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Neuropharmacology - Volume 69, June 2013, Pages 3-15
نویسندگان
, ,