Effects of occupational exposure to chlorpyrifos on neuropsychological function: A prospective longitudinal study

- We studied neurobehavioral function in workers exposed to chlorpyrifos (CPF).
- Workers had higher CPF exposures than referents, before and during the study.
- No impairment was observed at baseline or repeat examinations in CPF exposed group.
- Verbal memory domain higher in exposed at baseline but no group-time interactions.
- Results may not apply to applicators with high exposure or to low educated workers.

BackgroundExposure to chlorpyrifos (CPF), an organophosphorus (OP) anticholinesterase insecticide, occurs typically in settings where multiple agents are present (e.g., agriculture) and quantitative dose measures may be absent (e.g., pesticide application). Such exposures allow few opportunities to study potential neurobehavioral effects of CPF alone. We studied the relationship between CPF exposure and behavioral function among CPF manufacturing workers, which allowed identification, measurement, and estimation of exposure and important non-exposure variables that potentially could affect study findings.MethodsA prospective longitudinal study design was used to compare neurobehavioral function over a one-year period among 53 CPF workers and 60 referent workers. Quantitative and qualitative measures were used, and potential confounders were identified and tested for possible inclusion in our statistical models. Neurobehavioral function was assessed by neuropsychological tests covering various behavioral domains that may be adversely affected by exposure to CPF in sufficient amount.ResultsCPF workers had significantly greater CPF exposures during the study period than did referents at levels where physiologic effects on plasma butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) activity were apparent and with higher 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCPy/Cr) urinary excretion (p < 0.0001) and lower average BuChE activity (p < 0.01). No evidence for impaired neurobehavioral domains by either group of workers was observed at baseline, on repeat examination, or between examinations. CPF workers scored higher than referent workers on the verbal memory domain score (p = 0.03) at baseline, but there were no significant changes in verbal memory over time and no significant group-by-time interactions.ConclusionsThe study provides important information about CPF exposure in the workplace by not supporting our working hypothesis that CPF exposure associated with various aspects of the manufacturing process would be accompanied by adverse neurobehavioral effects detectable by quantitative neurobehavioral testing. Some aspects making this workplace site attractive for study and also present limitations for the generalization of results to other situations that might have exposures that vary widely between and within different facilities and locations. For example, these results might not apply to occupations such as applicators with higher exposure or to workers with low educational levels.