کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5855867 | 1562123 | 2016 | 45 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of the impact of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 and a cigarette on indoor air quality
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقایسه تاثیر سیستم گرمای تابشی 2.2 و سیگار بر کیفیت هوای داخل ساختمان
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
ETsHCIHPHCIAQModified risk tobacco productsMRTPDNPHRSPFPMVOCTHBP2,2′,4,4′-tetrahydroxybenzophenone2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine - 2،4-dinitrophenylhydrazineTHs - THSISO - ایزوHealth Canada Intense - بهداشت کانادا شدیدVolatile organic compounds - ترکیبات آلی فرارLOD یا Limit of detection - حد تشخیصenvironmental tobacco smoke - دود سیگار محیطیBackground - زمینهInternational Organization for Standardization - سازمان بین المللی استاندارد سازیTobacco heating system - سیستم گرمایش توتون و تنباکوlimit of detection - محدودیت تشخیصharmful and potentially harmful constituents - مواد مضر و بالقوه مضرHarmful and potentially harmful constituent - مواد مضر و مضرNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health - موسسه ملی ایمنی و بهداشت شغلیNIOSH - نیوشNicotine - نیکوتین Carbonyls - کربنایلIndoor air quality - کیفیت هوا در داخلHeat-not-burn - گرما نه سوختن
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
علوم محیط زیست
بهداشت، سم شناسی و جهش زایی
چکیده انگلیسی
The impact of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 (THS 2.2) on indoor air quality was evaluated in an environmentally controlled room using ventilation conditions recommended for simulating “Office”, “Residential” and “Hospitality” environments and was compared with smoking a lit-end cigarette (Marlboro Gold) under identical experimental conditions. The concentrations of eighteen indoor air constituents (respirable suspended particles (RSP) < 2.5 μm in diameter), ultraviolet particulate matter (UVPM), fluorescent particulate matter (FPM), solanesol, 3-ethenylpyridine, nicotine, 1,3-butadiene, acrylonitrile, benzene, isoprene, toluene, acetaldehyde, acrolein, crotonaldehyde, formaldehyde, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, and combined oxides of nitrogen) were measured. In simulations evaluating THS 2.2, the concentrations of most studied analytes did not exceed the background concentrations determined when non-smoking panelists were present in the environmentally controlled room under equivalent conditions. Only acetaldehyde and nicotine concentrations were increased above background concentrations in the “Office” (3.65 and 1.10 μg/m3), “Residential” (5.09 and 1.81 μg/m3) and “Hospitality” (1.40 and 0.66 μg/m3) simulations, respectively. Smoking Marlboro Gold resulted in greater increases in the concentrations of acetaldehyde (58.8, 83.8 and 33.1 μg/m3) and nicotine (34.7, 29.1 and 34.6 μg/m3) as well as all other measured indoor air constituents in the “Office”, “Residential” and “Hospitality” simulations, respectively.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology - Volume 80, October 2016, Pages 91-101
Journal: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology - Volume 80, October 2016, Pages 91-101
نویسندگان
Maya I. Mitova, Pedro B. Campelos, Catherine G. Goujon-Ginglinger, Serge Maeder, Nicolas Mottier, Emmanuel G.R. Rouget, Manuel Tharin, Anthony R. Tricker,