The risk-based approach to ATMP development - Generally accepted by regulators but infrequently used by companies

- In 75% of the proposals to omit animal studies the risk-based approach was used.
- The CHMP accepted 40% of the proposals to omit studies.
- The CHMP stated that additional data was necessary for 35% of the proposals.
- The risk-based approach facilitates science-driven drug development.

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are the cutting edge of drug innovation. ATMPs have different challenges than other drug classes. To accommodate these challenges and facilitate science-driven development, flexibility in the requirements to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this rapidly evolving drug class is necessary. To create flexibility, the European Union introduced the risk-based approach. This approach provides the possibility of omitting guideline-based studies based on risk analyses. To gain insight into the effect of the risk-based approach on the non-clinical development of ATMPs, two questions are addressed in this paper. Firstly, “Do companies use a risk-based approach for the non-clinical development of ATMPs?” and, secondly, “Does the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) accept non-clinical development programs based on the risk-based approach?” Scientific advice letters formulated by the CHMP were analyzed. The risk-based approach was used to justify deviations from the guidelines in the majority (75%) of the cases. The CHMP accepted 40% of the proposals to omit studies and stated that additional data was necessary to make an informed decision for 35% of the proposals. This indicates that the risk-based approach facilitates the science-driven development of ATMPs.