کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5882049 | 1149352 | 2015 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

BackgroundMedical isotopes are required for sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer, but are in critical shortage. Our center uses a modification of the standard SC, called CRC, that has been shown to require less medical isotope for the same procedure. Our objective was to determine if there was a significant difference between SC and CRC in successful lymph node identification in breast cancer patients.Patients and MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study using prospectively-collected data on 1205 consecutive early, clinically node-negative breast cancer patients who underwent a SNB between 2002 and 2008 at 2 tertiary hospitals in Canada.ResultsThere was no difference in successful lymph node identification rate (PÂ = .50) or in the mean number of positive nodes identified between the 2 colloids (PÂ = .88). The CRC group had a significantly lower rate of delayed adverse events (4.91% vs. 0.59%, PÂ < .0001) even after adjusting for whether axillary dissection occurred on the same day as the biopsy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.40; PÂ = .001).ConclusionOur findings suggest that there is no significant difference between CRC and SC in detecting sentinel nodes; however, CRC uses less medical isotopes. In the current climate of critical shortages of medical radioisotopes, radiocolloids should be selected for use based on amount of radioisotope required.
Journal: Clinical Breast Cancer - Volume 15, Issue 1, February 2015, Pages e41-e45