کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5943435 1574719 2016 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Case-based educational intervention to assess change in providers' knowledge and attitudes towards the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Management Guideline
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مداخله آموزشی مبتنی بر موردی برای ارزیابی تغییر در دانش و نگرش های ارائه دهندگان به کالج آمریکایی قلب و عروق / انجمن قلب آمریکا راهنمای کلسترول مدیریت
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
چکیده انگلیسی


- 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guideline was controversial and had sub-optimal adherence.
- We offered case based educational intervention to assess improvement in provider-level knowledge gaps.
- The intervention was associated with 16-53% absolute improvement in knowledge domain.
- There was 4-36% improvement in attitude domain.
- An engaging case based intervention can help in effective dissemination of the cholesterol guideline.

ObjectivePrior studies have shown provider-level knowledge gaps regarding the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline on the treatment of cholesterol and concerns about 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk estimation. The effect of an educational intervention to mitigate knowledge gaps is unknown.MethodsWe developed a questionnaire and administered it to providers before (pre-training) and after (post-training) a case-based educational intervention across 6 sites in Texas. The intervention highlighted the key recommendations of the 2013 guideline and the differences from the prior guideline mainly using clinical-vignettes. Several practice pertinent items were also discussed.ResultsMost participants were providers-in-training (78%) in internal medicine (68%). Compared to pre-training, the post-training metrics were: 43% vs. 82% for providers' ability to identify 4 statin benefit groups; 47% vs. 97% for their awareness of the ASCVD risk threshold of ≥7.5% to initiate discussion about risks/benefits of statin therapy; 9% vs. 40% for awareness of differences between the Framingham and the ASCVD risk estimator; 26% vs. 78% for awareness of the definition of statin intensity; 35% vs. 62% for using a repeat lipid panel to document treatment response and adherence; and 46% vs. 81% for confidence in using the ASCVD risk estimator, respectively.ConclusionsA case-based educational intervention was associated with significant increase in providers' knowledge towards the 2013 cholesterol guideline, which could be related to the engaging nature of our intervention, using practice pertinent information and clinical vignettes. Such interventions could be useful in effective dissemination of the cholesterol guideline.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Atherosclerosis - Volume 246, March 2016, Pages 115-120
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , ,