Immediate Results and Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Patients With Unprotected Distal Left Main Restenosis: The CORPAL Registry (Córdoba and Las Palmas)

ObjectivesThe goal of this study was to assess the immediate and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in an unprotected distal left main coronary artery (UDLM).BackgroundPCI for UDLM-ISR can be complex. Limited information is available on procedural and clinical outcomes.MethodsBetween May 2002 and February 2011, UDLM-ISR after drug-eluting stent implantation was observed in 79 of 1,102 patients (7%). Seventy-five were treated by repeat PCI using a simple approach (balloon/in-stent implantation) or a complex strategy (additional stent/double-stenting technique). A diagnosis of mild or severe restenosis was considered depending on the number of bifurcation segments affected (1 vs. >1). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, and myocardial infarction.ResultsISR treatment was performed using a simple approach in 44 (58%) patients, and using a complex strategy in 31 (42%). After 46 ± 26 months, the MACE rate was 22%. Patients treated with a simple approach had a lower incidence of MACE at follow-up compared with patients treated with a complex strategy, regardless of the restenosis extent (mild restenosis: 93% vs. 67%, p < 0.05; severe: 70% vs. 23%, p < 0.05). On Cox regression analysis, diabetes was the only predictor of MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 23.70; p < 0.05), whereas a simple strategy for ISR treatment was associated with lower risk (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.79; p = 0.02).ConclusionsPCI for UDLM-ISR is safe and feasible, with a high rate of procedural success and an acceptable long-term MACE rate. A simple strategy, when applicable, appears to be a good treatment option, associated with a lower event rate at follow-up.