کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5996359 | 1180661 | 2016 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

- Neck circumference has been considered an index of upper body fat accumulation in children, adolescents and adults.
- Few studies explored the association between neck circumference and metabolic syndrome factors in children.
- Neck circumference is an effective tool to identify 3-10 year-old European children with unfavorable metabolic profile.
- Age- and sex-specific neck circumference cut-off values to identify children with unfavorable metabolic profile are provided.
Background and aimsSeveral studies demonstrated that larger neck circumference (NC) in children and adolescents may help to identify obesity and cardio-metabolic abnormalities. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between NC and metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk factors and to determine the utility of this anthropometric index to identify MetS in European children.Methods and resultsThe present cross-sectional analysis includes 15,673 children (3-10 years) participating in the IDEFICS study. A continuous MetS (cMetS) score was calculated summing age and sex standardized z-scores of specific MetS risk factors. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, stratified by one-year age groups, was used to determine the ability of NC to identify children with unfavorable metabolic profile, corresponding to cMetS score â¥Â 90th percentile.The areas under the curve values for NC associated with cMetS score values â¥Â 90th percentile were significantly greater in girls than in boys (p < 0.001), except for 5 < 6 years group. For boys, optimal NC cut-off values ranged from 26.2 cm for the lowest age group (3 < 4 years), up to 30.9 cm for the highest age group (9 < 10 years). In girls, corresponding values varied from 24.9 cm to 29.6 cm.ConclusionThe study demonstrated the efficacy of NC in identifying European children with an unfavorable metabolic profile.
Journal: Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases - Volume 26, Issue 6, June 2016, Pages 510-516