کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6001799 1182957 2015 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Impact of esomeprazole on platelet reactivity and clinical outcome according to CYP2C19 genotype in coronary heart disease patients during dual antiplatelet therapy
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Impact of esomeprazole on platelet reactivity and clinical outcome according to CYP2C19 genotype in coronary heart disease patients during dual antiplatelet therapy
چکیده انگلیسی


- There is a racial difference in prevalence of CYP2C19 genotype.
- No differences in residual platelet reactivity between esomeprazole and non-esomeprazole according to CYP2C19 genotype.
- Concomitant use of esomeprazole with clopidogrel may be not associated with adverse events.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism and co-therapy with esomeprazole on the antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel.BackgroundThe antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel depends on CYP2C19 polymorphism or the co-administration of some kind of proton pump inhibitor (PPI).MethodsCYP2C19 genotype and the residual platelet reactivity (RPR) were measured in 361 coronary heart disease patients (male, mean age 69 yrs), and the risk of cardiovascular events over a 3-month follow-up was assessed to evaluate the impact of co-administration of esomeprazole during dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel.ResultsThe values of RPR did not differ between esomeprazole and non-esomeprazole groups (4389 ± 1112 versus 4079 ± 1355 AU · min, P = 0.103). RPR value was higher in intermediate metabolizers (IM) than in extensive metabolizers (EM) (4089 ± 1252 versus 3697 ± 1215 AU · min P = 0.012) and, similarly, higher in poor metabolizers (PM) than in IM (4884 ± 1027 versus 4089 ± 1252 AU · min, P < 0.001). There were no differences in RPR between esomeprazole and non-esomeprazole groups according to CYP2C19 genotype (EM, 3954 ± 1192 versus 3645 ± 1220 AU · min, P = 0.361; IM, 4401 ± 1063 versus 4051 ± 1271 AU · min, P = 0.293; PM, 4917 ± 669 versus 4876 ± 1099 AU · min, P = 0.907, respectively). There was also no difference in clinical outcomes between esomeprazole and non-esomeprazole groups in the three-month follow-up (0% versus 0.92%, P = 0.487).ConclusionsThese results suggest that concomitant use of esomeprazole with clopidogrel is not associated with reduced antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel or increased risk of cardiovascular events, irrespective of CYP2C19 genotype.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Thrombosis Research - Volume 135, Issue 6, June 2015, Pages 1081-1086
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,