ReviewCumulative risk assessment lessons learned: A review of case studies and issue papers

- Authors identify six lessons learned from ten US EPA cumulative risk assessments.
- Due to a population focus cumulative risk assessments need engaged stakeholders.
- Tiering can focus the scope of cumulative risk assessments and prioritize stressors.
- An iterative approach for cumulative assessments reduces complications of multiple stressors.
- Quantifying risks in vulnerable populations is important, but data gaps remain.

Cumulative risk assessments (CRAs) examine potential risks posed by exposure to multiple and sometimes disparate environmental stressors. CRAs are more resource intensive than single chemical assessments, and pose additional challenges and sources of uncertainty. CRAs may examine the impact of several factors on risk, including exposure magnitude and timing, chemical mixture composition, as well as physical, biological, or psychosocial stressors. CRAs are meant to increase the relevance of risk assessments, providing decision makers with information based on real world exposure scenarios that improve the characterization of actual risks and hazards. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has evaluated a number of CRAs, performed by or commissioned for the Agency, to seek insight into CRA concepts, methods, and lessons learned. In this article, ten case studies and five issue papers on key CRA topics are examined and a set of lessons learned are identified for CRA implementation. The lessons address the iterative nature of CRAs, importance of considering vulnerability, need for stakeholder engagement, value of a tiered approach, new methods to assess multiroute exposures to chemical mixtures, and the impact of geographical scale on approach and purpose.