کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6310269 1307465 2013 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Spatiotemporal evaluation of water quality incidents in Japan between 1996 and 2007
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ارزیابی محدوده ی حوادث کیفیت آب در ژاپن بین سال های 1996 تا 2007
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم محیط زیست شیمی زیست محیطی
چکیده انگلیسی


- A spatiotemporal evaluation of water quality incidents in Japan has been analyzed.
- Water pollution incidents almost tripled in the 12 years from 1996 to 2007.
- Oil makes up the largest proportion of pollutants nationwide (76.61%).
- The main cause was “Unknown” (43%), followed by “Poor working practice”.

We present a spatiotemporal evaluation of water quality incidents in Japan considering incident numbers, incident causes, pollutant categories, and pollution effects. Water pollution incidents in first-class river systems almost tripled to about 1487 in the 12 years from 1996 to 2007. In addition, oil makes up the largest proportion of pollutants nationwide (76.61%) and the major source of pollution for each region in Japan. Moreover, every category shows a growth trend, especially since 2005. The main cause of incidents was “Unknown” (43%), followed by “Poor working practice” (24%), and then by “Accident” (10%) and “Other” (10%). In Hokuriku, however, the main cause of incidents was “Poor working practice” (36%), which is greater than “Unknown” (30%). Finally, waterworks (approximately 60%) was the largest of four kinds of water supply infrastructure affected by pollution incidents, followed by simplified waterworks. The population affected by offensive odors and tastes peaked in 1990 and has been decreasing. Overall, the results show the characteristics of incidents from 1996 to 2007, with significant implications for adaptation measures, strategies and policies to reduce water quality incidents.

According to the statistic of 10 581 incidents in Japan, the main cause of incidents was “Unknown” (43%), followed by “Poor working practice” (24%), and then by “Accident” (10%) and “Other” (10%). In Hokuriku, however, the main cause of incidents was “Poor working practice” (36%), which is greater than “Unknown” (30%).

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Chemosphere - Volume 93, Issue 6, October 2013, Pages 946-953
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,