کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6313306 | 1619041 | 2016 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- No increased risk of thyroid cancer associated with living near NPP was found.
- The pooled estimates did not reveal different patterns of risk by gender.
- Living less than 20Â km from NPP was associated with a significant increase in the risk of thyroid cancer in good quality studies.
There has been public concern regarding the safety of residing near nuclear power plants, and the extent of risk for thyroid cancer among adults living near nuclear power plants has not been fully explored. In the present study, a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies was conducted to investigate the association between living near nuclear power plants and the risk of thyroid cancer. A comprehensive literature search was performed on studies published up to March 2015 on the association between nuclear power plants and thyroid cancer risk. The summary standardized incidence ratio (SIR), standardized mortality ratio (SMR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effect model of meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses were performed by study quality. Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, covering 36 nuclear power stations in 10 countries. Overall, summary estimates showed no significant increased thyroid cancer incidence or mortality among residents living near nuclear power plants (summary SIRÂ =Â 0.98; 95% CI 0.87-1.11, summary SMRÂ =Â 0.80; 95% CI 0.62-1.04). The pooled estimates did not reveal different patterns of risk by gender, exposure definition, or reference population. However, sensitivity analysis by exposure definition showed that living less than 20Â km from nuclear power plants was associated with a significant increase in the risk of thyroid cancer in well-designed studies (summary ORÂ =Â 1.75; 95% CI 1.17-2.64). Our study does not support an association between living near nuclear power plants and risk of thyroid cancer but does support a need for well-designed future studies.
Journal: Environment International - Volume 87, February 2016, Pages 42-48