کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6363866 1622930 2015 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Modeling reference evapotranspiration with calculated targets. Assessment and implications
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تبخیر تعرق مرجع مدل سازی با اهداف محاسبه شده. ارزیابی و پیامدهای آن
کلمات کلیدی
تبخیر تعرق مرجع، اهداف محاسبه شده، مدل های داده رانده شده، کالیبراسیون،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک علوم زراعت و اصلاح نباتات
چکیده انگلیسی
Due to the absence of experimental reference evapotranspiration (ETo) records, data-driven models consider in most cases calculated ETo targets to train and test the models, usually according to the standard FAO56 Penman Monteith equation (FAO56-PM). This procedure is also adopted for calibrating more conventional empirical approaches like the well-known Hargreaves (HG) equation. This study aims at assessing the performance implications derived from using calculated targets instead of experimental measurements for training and testing data-driven models or calibrating empirical methods. Therefore an application of a gene expression programming (GEP) based approach for estimating ETo is presented considering calculated and lysimetric targets fed with two different input combinations and assessed through k-fold testing. The same procedure is adopted to evaluate the calibration of the HG equation. Finally, the FAO56-PM and the HG equations are compared with their corresponding GEP models bearing in mind the type of targets used. The locally trained GEP4 and GEP6 models trained using the experimental lysimetric targets are more accurate than the corresponding HG and FAO56-PM equations, assessed using lysimetric benchmarks. The external performance accuracy of GEP4 and GEP6 models decreases considerably in the cross-station approach using experimental targets. In this case, the FAO56-PM and the HG equations might be preferable. The accuracy of the GEP models trained with calculated targets decreases considerably when the performance is assessed using experimental benchmarks. The conclusions drawn when only calculated benchmarks are used might be not sound or even false. The same applies for empirical equations calibrated with calculated targets. Four new GEP-based equations (one per input combination and station) are provided to estimate ETo.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Agricultural Water Management - Volume 149, February 2015, Pages 81-90
نویسندگان
, , , , ,