Norway spruce cone crops in uneven-aged stands in southern Finland: A case study

- At each harvest entry, some large, prolific trees should be retained as seed trees.
- Seed trees should be chosen as based on their cone-crop production history.
- Cone production in individual trees correlates negatively with stand density.
- Digital photographs are useful in cone crop inventory.

Norway spruce cone crops in individual trees from two seed ripening years 2012 and 2014 were studied. Data were collected from five stands in southern Finland, managed by single-tree selection harvests since the 1980s. The upper third of living crown of each individual tree was photographed for digital cone counting with image analysis. The average number of cones per tree for trees bearing any cones was 92 in 2014 and 66 in 2012. Highest cone numbers found per individual tree were 526 in the year 2014 and 364 in the year 2012. Of all trees studied, 55.5% produced cones during both years, 9.6% produced cones once and 34.9% did not produce cones in 2012 or 2014. The number of cones per tree in 2014 was positively correlated with tree diameter at breast height and the presence of cones (at least twenty) in that particular individual two years earlier and negatively correlated with local basal area. The quality of the seed crop in 2014 as determined in two of the stands was poor. Based on X-ray analyses, 44% of seeds were empty, 29% were damaged by insects feeding on seeds (Plemeliella abietina or Megastigmus strobilobius) and only 25% were full and capable of germination. The results have implications for management practices in uneven-aged Norway spruce stands. It is suggested that at each harvest entry, some large, prolific trees should be retained in order to increase the total number of seeds produced in a stand to enhance regeneration and the recruitment of new seedlings.