کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
647053 1457171 2012 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Configuration dependence and optimization of the entrainment performance for gas–gas and gas–liquid ejectors
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی شیمی جریان سیال و فرایندهای انتقال
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Configuration dependence and optimization of the entrainment performance for gas–gas and gas–liquid ejectors
چکیده انگلیسی

This paper describes a numerical study of entrainment behavior and its configuration dependence for gas–gas and gas–liquid ejectors. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model is developed and experimental validation is undertaken over a wide range of operation conditions for ejector with different configurations. The predicted values by CFD simulation prove to be in good agreement with the experimental data. The investigation results indicate that pseudo-shock length has a dominant effect on entrainment performance and geometry optimization. Significant difference is noted in pseudo-shock length for gas–gas and gas–liquid ejectors, and this is mainly because the viscosity similarity markedly differs within the range of 0.01–1.0, depending on the primary and secondary fluids of usage. Therefore the optimum mixing tube length to diameter ratio is about 1–2 for general gas–liquid ejectors while 5–7 for gas–gas ejectors. As an exception to the general gas–liquid ejectors, the optimum L/D ratio in He–LH2 ejector is about 4, lying between that of the gas–gas ejector and gas–liquid ejector but still consistent with the pseudo-shock length. If the maximum allowable length of ejector mixing tube is less than the optimum value, placing the primary nozzle exit upstream of the mixing tube can greatly improve the entrainment performance.

.Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► Performance of gas–gas and gas–liquid ejectors is studied by validated CFD model.
► The optimum value of mixing tube length is equivalent to the pseudo-shock length LPS.
► LPS is determined by viscosity similarity and differs greatly for distinct ejectors.
► The optimum L/D is 1, 6, 4 for general gas–liquid, gas, He–LH2 ejector respectively.
► Place nozzle exit upstream of mixing tube to improve ejector performance when L

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Applied Thermal Engineering - Volume 48, 15 December 2012, Pages 237–248
نویسندگان
, , ,