کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6545013 159874 2014 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Optimal rotation age for carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation in Vietnam
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
سن چرخشی بهینه برای تسهیل کربن و حفاظت از تنوع زیستی در ویتنام
کلمات کلیدی
حفاظت از تنوع زیستی، پرنده ها، تداخل کربن، جنگل چندگانه، سن چرخشی بهینه، ارزش خالص فعلی،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک جنگلداری
چکیده انگلیسی
Biodiversity loss is a major problem in terms of loss of genetic and ecosystem services and more specifically via impacts on the livelihoods, food security and health of the poor. This study modeled forest management strategies that balance economic gains and biodiversity conservation benefits in planted tropical forests. A forest-level model was developed that maximized the net present value (NPV) from selling timber and carbon sequestration while maintaining a given level of biodiversity (as per the population density of birds). The model was applied to Eucalyptus urophylla planted forests in Yen Bai Province, Vietnam. It was found that the inclusion of biodiversity conservation in the model induces a longer optimal rotation age compared to the period that maximizes the joint value from timber and carbon sequestration (from 8 to 10.9 years). The average NPV when considering timber values plus carbon sequestration was 13 million Vietnamese Dong (VND) ha− 1 (765 USD ha− 1), and timber, carbon sequestration and biodiversity values were 11 million VND (676 USD) ha− 1. Given this differential, governments in such tropical countries may need to consider additional incentives to forest owners if they are to encourage maximizing biodiversity and its associated benefits. The results also have some implications for implementing the climate control measure of “Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation-plus (REDD +)” in developing countries, i.e., payment for carbon sequestration and biodiversity benefits in planted forests.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Forest Policy and Economics - Volume 38, January 2014, Pages 56-64
نویسندگان
,