کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
8128263 | 1522991 | 2018 | 41 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of huff-n-puff gas injection and solvent injection in large-scale shale gas condensate reservoirs
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقایسه تزریق گاز تزریق گاز و تزریق محلول در مخازن مایع گاز شیلی
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
علوم زمین و سیارات
علوم زمین و سیاره ای (عمومی)
چکیده انگلیسی
Results demonstrate ethane to be a superior injection fluid with a high recovery factor for most scenarios, accompanied by a relatively higher profit to investment ratio and shorter payback period. Ethane injection recovers the heavy condensate components more efficiently compared to methane and solvent injection for a given gas condensate composition. This advantage is complemented by ethane's capability to equally recover all of other hydrocarbon components from the reservoir. The recovery performance of solvent huff-n-puff for a leaner gas condensate fluid is significantly greater than that for the richer gas-condensate reservoir fluid. The main difference in the optimization of gas and solvent performance is highlighted. Gases require longer injection and production time, whereas solvents perform better with shorter injection time and longer production time.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering - Volume 52, April 2018, Pages 434-453
Journal: Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering - Volume 52, April 2018, Pages 434-453
نویسندگان
Sharanya Sharma, James J. Sheng,