کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
952377 927505 2012 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Mammography screening and trust: The case of interval breast cancer
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی سیاست های بهداشت و سلامت عمومی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Mammography screening and trust: The case of interval breast cancer
چکیده انگلیسی

Interval cancer is cancer detected between screening rounds among screening participants. In the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme, 19 per 10,000 screened women are diagnosed with interval cancer. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 26 such women. The women interpreted their interval breast cancer in two ways: that mammography can never be completely certain, or as an experience characterized by shock and doubts about the technology and the conduct of the medical experts. Being diagnosed with interval cancer thus influenced their trust in mammography, but not necessarily to the point of creating distrust. The women saw themselves as exceptions in an otherwise beneficial screening programme. Convinced that statistics had shown benefits from mammography screening and knowing others whose malignant tumours had been detected in the programme, the women bracketed their own experiences and continued trusting mammography screening. Facing a potentially lethal disease and a lack of alternatives to mammography screening left the women with few options but to trust the programme in order to maintain hope. In other words, trust may not only be a basis for hope, but also a consequence of it.


► Experiences of women in Norway who have interval breast cancer after participating in screening are underreported.
► Trust in mammography screening is essential for participation rates.
► Some women are surprised about having cancer between screening rounds and question the technology and the expertise.
► Women may be willing to see themselves as exceptions and rebuild their trust in the benefit of mammography screening.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Social Science & Medicine - Volume 75, Issue 10, November 2012, Pages 1746–1752
نویسندگان
, , , , ,