کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
9620107 | 159439 | 2005 | 13 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Fourth year response of aspen seedlings to lime, nitrogen and phosphorus applied at planting and 1 year after planting
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک
بوم شناسی، تکامل، رفتار و سامانه شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Fourth year response of aspen seedlings to lime, nitrogen and phosphorus applied at planting and 1 year after planting Fourth year response of aspen seedlings to lime, nitrogen and phosphorus applied at planting and 1 year after planting](/preview/png/9620107.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
The 12.5Â g P (as 64Â g triple superphosphate) per tree applied at planting increased height growth 15-18% according to site and increased stem volume growth 42-58% after 4 years. Survival was increased at Drayton Valley (5%) and Manning (12%), with no effect at Linaria. Responses to the same fertilizers applied in May of the second year, to previously unfertilized trees, were small, except that N fertilizers caused mortality of as much as 33% at Drayton Valley. Except at Manning, N treatment increased leaf N concentrations without affecting growth, apparently, because N concentrations were already adequate. At Manning, N increased stem volume in year 1. When increased survival was also considered, the P treatments at Drayton Valley and Manning increased volume on a land area basis 69.6 and 62.6%, but at Linaria, where survival was unaffected, the increase was 49.1%. Dolomitic limestone had a small effect on growth at Manning, which was increased in P treatments also receiving lime. Survival was strongly affected by lime at this site and showed an overall linear increase with lime level, up to 9.4%, with increases of 13-18% in the presence of P. Fertilization at planting was very effective in promoting growth and establishment and the alternative of fertilizing in May of the second year was a failure. Inadequate spring precipitation and competing vegetation might explain this failure.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Forest Ecology and Management - Volume 219, Issues 2â3, 25 November 2005, Pages 216-228
Journal: Forest Ecology and Management - Volume 219, Issues 2â3, 25 November 2005, Pages 216-228
نویسندگان
R. van den Driessche, F. Niemi, L. Charleson,