کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
10559115 969218 2005 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of two digestion procedures for the determination of lead in lichens by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه شیمی شیمی آنالیزی یا شیمی تجزیه
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Comparison of two digestion procedures for the determination of lead in lichens by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry
چکیده انگلیسی
The efficiency of two procedures for the digestion of lichen was investigated using a heating block and a microwave oven. In the open vessels, concentrated nitric acid was added to the samples, left for 1 h, and the addition of 30% (v / v) hydrogen peroxide completed the digestion. In the closed system, the complete digestion was performed using concentrated nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide, reducing the amount of chemicals, time and contamination risk. Both digestion methods gave comparable results, and recoveries were statistically not different. For a lichen sample spiked with 10 μg Pb, the recovery was 111% and 110% using microwave and heating block digestion, respectively, while it was 100% and 103% for a 100 μg Pb spike. For the determination by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry samples were diluted 20 times with water and a volume of 20 μL was injected into the graphite furnace without chemical modifier. Pyrolysis and atomization temperatures of 700 °C and 1500 °C, respectively, were used. The characteristic mass was 8.4 ± 0.6 pg for aqueous calibration solutions and 8.9 ± 0.8 pg for samples. Calibration was against matrix matched standards. The recovery test showed some contamination problem with the lowest concentrations in both procedures. The detection limits were 4.4 μg L− 1 with microwave oven and 5.4 μg L− 1 with the heating block in the undiluted blank.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy - Volume 60, Issue 5, 30 June 2005, Pages 755-758
نویسندگان
, , ,