کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1326359 | 977426 | 2005 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

A variety of methods, conventional and non-conventional, are used in attempts to prepare the compounds (η6-corannulene)M(CO)3 (M = Cr, Mo, W), all unsuccessful. Conventional methods are also utilized in attempts to prepare the compound [CpFe(η6-corannulene)]PF6, but these result in mixtures of cationic CpFe(arene) complexes containing partially hydrogenated corannulene; similar results have been reported for other polyaromatic hydrocarbons. DFT calculations on the compound (η6-corannulene)Cr(CO)3 suggest that the (η6-corannulene)-Cr linkage is only a few kcal/mol weaker than the corresponding bond in (η6-benzene)Cr(CO)3, implying that failures in syntheses arise from kinetic, not thermodynamic problems.
An extensive series of attempts to synthesize the compounds (η6-corannulene)M(CO)3 (M = Cr, Mo, W), utilizing virtually every standard and non-standard procedure known for the synthesis of compounds of the type (η6-arene)M(CO)3, have all failed miserably. DFT calculations suggest that the η6-corannulene–Cr bond of (η6-corannulene)Cr(CO)3 is only marginally weaker than the correspond arene–metal bond in the very stable (η6-benzene)Cr(CO)3, and it seems that the reasons for synthetic failures are kinetic in nature.Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide
Journal: Journal of Organometallic Chemistry - Volume 690, Issue 14, 15 July 2005, Pages 3440–3450