Quantitative comparison of dynamic controllability between a reactive distillation column and a conventional multi-unit process

A comparison of the steady-state economic optimum designs of two alternative chemical processes was presented in a previous paper [Kaymak, D. B., & Luyben, W. L. (2004). A quantitative comparison of reactive distillation with conventional multi-unit reactor/column/recycle systems for different chemical equilibrium constants. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 43, 2493–2507]. A generic exothermic reversible reaction A + B ↔ C + D occurs in both flowsheets, which consist of a conventional multi-unit reactor/separator/recycle structure and a reactive distillation column. Results showed that the reactive distillation process is significantly less expensive than the conventional process for a wide range of the chemical equilibrium constant when there is no mismatch between the temperature favorable for reaction and the temperature favorable for vapor–liquid separation.A reactive distillation column has fewer control degrees of freedom than a conventional multi-unit system. Therefore a reactive distillation column may have worse dynamic response than a conventional process. The purpose of this paper is to compare the dynamic controllability of these two alternative processes.Three different chemical equilibrium constants are considered. Several control structures are developed for each flowsheet, and their effectiveness is evaluated. Disturbances in production rate and fresh feed compositions are considered.The conventional multi-unit process provides significantly better control. The operability region is much larger, there is less variability in product quality and the dynamic responses are faster than those of the reactive column. Thus, these results demonstrate that there is a significant trade-off in this system between optimum economic steady-state design and dynamic controllability.