کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1944775 1053239 2010 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Membrane charge dependent states of the β-amyloid fragment Aβ (16–35) with differently charged micelle aggregates
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی زیست شیمی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Membrane charge dependent states of the β-amyloid fragment Aβ (16–35) with differently charged micelle aggregates
چکیده انگلیسی

Aβ (16–35) is the hydrophobic central core of β-amyloid peptide, the main component of plaques found in the brain tissue of Alzheimer's disease patients. Depending on the conditions present, β-amyloid peptides undergo a conformational transition from random coil or α-helical monomers, to highly toxic β-sheet oligomers and aggregate fibrils. The behavior of β-amyloid peptide at plasma membrane level has been extensively investigated, and membrane charge has been proved to be a key factor modulating its conformational properties. In the present work we probed the conformational behavior of Aβ (16–35) in response to negative charge modifications of the micelle surface. CD and NMR conformational analyses were performed in negatively charged pure SDS micelles and in zwitterionic DPC micelles “doped” with small amounts of SDS. To analyze the tendency of Aβ (16–35) to interact with these micellar systems, we performed EPR experiments on three spin-labeled analogues of Aβ (16–35), bearing the methyl 3-(2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-1-oxypyrrolinyl) methanethiolsulfonate spin label at the N-terminus, in the middle of the sequence and at the C-terminus, respectively. Our conformational data show that, by varying the negative charge of the membrane, Aβ (16–35) undergoes a conformational transition from a soluble helical–kink–helical structure, to a U-turn shaped conformation that resembles protofibril models.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes - Volume 1798, Issue 3, March 2010, Pages 660–671
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , ,