کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1970247 | 1059798 | 2008 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

ObjectiveThere are evidence suggesting that APOE-ɛ4 allele play an important role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) by reducing peripheral levels and activities of a broad spectrum of nonenzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants systems. However, the link between APOE genotype, oxidative stress, and AD has yet to be established. In this study we examined whether antioxidant defense mechanism exacerbates the risk of AD in individual carrying APOE-ɛ4 allele in a population from Tehran, Iran.MethodWe determined the enzymatic activities of the erythrocyte Cu–Zn superoxide dismutase (Cu–Zn SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), catalase (CAT) and serum level of total antioxidant status(TAS) in various APOE genotypes in 91 patients with AD and 91 healthy subjects as control group (age and sex-matched).ResultThe results showed that the TAS level and the activities of enzymatic antioxidants CAT and GSH-Px were significantly lower and the SOD activity was significantly higher in AD patients compared to controls. The AD patients with APOE-ɛ4 allele genotype had significantly lower serum TAS concentration and lower erythrocytes GSH-Px and CAT activities (p = 0.001) but significantly higher erythrocytes Cu–Zn SOD activity (p = 0.001) than the non-APOE-ɛ4 carrier AD and the control group. In addition, the association observed between the factors involved in an antioxidant defense mechanism and APOE-ɛ4 allele in AD increased with age of the subjects.ConclusionThese data indicate that the reduced serum level of TAS and activity of CAT, GSH-Px and increased SOD exacerbate the risk of AD in individuals carrying APOE-ɛ4 allele. The reduced antioxidants defense in APOE–ɛ4 allele carrier may contribute to beta-amyloidosis. This effect, however, is more pronounced in the AD patients older than 75 years of age. This suggests that a therapeutic modality should be considered for these subjects.
Journal: Clinical Biochemistry - Volume 41, Issue 12, August 2008, Pages 932–936