کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
211907 | 462024 | 2016 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Brannerite characterised by XRD and SEM–EDX before and after leaching in acidic ferric sulphate
• Brannerite undergoes metamictisation and natural alteration to anatase.
• Brannerite near the altered areas is most susceptible to leaching.
• Anatase was identified as a product of the leaching.
Brannerite, UTi2O6, is the most common refractory uranium mineral and is the most important uranium ore mineral after uraninite and coffinite. In order to develop an effective treatment method for the hydrometallurgical extraction of uranium from ores containing brannerite, it is necessary to understand the chemistry of the leaching process. Part 1 of this series described the results of a study of the chemical reaction mechanisms of brannerite under conditions similar to those used industrially. In this paper, the mineralogical data obtained from samples collected during the leaching work is used to derive further insight into the transformations that take place during leaching. Detailed characterisation of the brannerite feed specimen and leach residues was carried out using surface imaging and X-ray diffraction techniques. It was shown that the brannerite specimen is heterogeneous, consisting of at least two phases. The brannerite phase was metamict and showed signs of natural alteration to fine-grained (10–20 nm) crystalline anatase. Comparisons between the feed and residues showed that the X-ray amorphous materials, in particular lead and silicon enriched areas identified near the anatase were most susceptible to leaching while the crystalline material was relatively resistant to leaching. These results demonstrate that the extent of brannerite alteration and its texture are important considerations to the hydrometallurgical behaviour of a particular ore along with the typical concerns such as grade, liberation size and gangue mineralogy.
Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide
Journal: Hydrometallurgy - Volume 159, January 2016, Pages 95–106