Intradermally-administered influenza virus vaccine is safe and immunogenic in healthy adults 18–64 years of age

• We compared reduced dose intradermal (ID) to standard dose intramuscular (IM) influenza vaccine.
• Three lots of ID vaccine were comparable to each other.
• The immunogenicity of the two vaccines was comparable.
• Injection site reactions were more frequent with the ID vaccine except pain.
• Systemic reactions were comparable except for more myalgia with IM vaccine.

BackgroundTo increase vaccine acceptance, intradermal (ID) influenza vaccine (Fluzone® Intradermal, Sanofi Pasteur Inc.) may be an attractive alternative to intramuscular (IM) vaccination due to smaller needle and volume injected.MethodsA multicenter, randomized (2:1 ID vs IM vaccines) study, blinded for ID vaccine lots, was conducted among 4292 adults 18–64 years of age enrolled in October 2008. Three lots of investigational trivalent influenza vaccine containing 9 μg hemagglutinin (HA) per strain in 0.1 mL administered ID with a 30 gauge, 1.5 mm long needle were compared to standard dose vaccine (0.5 mL containing 15 μg HA/strain) given IM.ResultsThe post-vaccination antibody geometric mean titers (GMT) for the ID vaccine were similar to the IM vaccine (H1N1: 193.2 vs. 178.3, H3N2: 246.7 vs. 230.7, and B: 102.5 vs. 126.9). Non-inferiority was met for the ID vaccine compared to IM vaccine as assessed by antibody GMT ratios (IM/ID) for all three virus strains (H1N1: 0.92, H3N2: 0.94, and B: 1.24). Seroconversion rates were non-inferior for H1N1 and H3N2, but not for B (ID vs. IM: H1N1: 61.2% vs. 60.5%, H3N2: 75.3% vs. 74.8%, and B: 46.2% vs. 54.2%). Seroprotection (HAI titer ≥1:40) rates were similar between groups (ID vs. IM, H1N1: 91.1% vs. 91.7%, H3N2: 90.7% vs. 91.4%, and B: 87.4% vs. 89.3%). Local injection site reactions overall were more common with ID than IM vaccine (ID vs. IM: 89.2% vs. 60.2%), but were usually grade 1 or 2 and transient. The frequencies of local injection site pain and systemic reactions were similar between vaccine groups, except more myalgia with IM vaccine.ConclusionsThe ID vaccine elicited immune responses comparable to IM vaccine except for the seroconversion rate to B virus. With the exception of pain, local injection site reactions were more common with the ID vaccine, but well-tolerated and of short duration.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00772109.