Comparative effects of the anti-platelet drugs, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, and cilostazol on aspirin-induced gastric bleeding and damage in rats

AimsThe present study compared the effects of frequently used anti-platelet drugs, such as clopidogrel, ticlopidine, and cilostazol, on the gastric bleeding and ulcerogenic responses induced by intraluminal perfusion with 25 mM aspirin acidified with 25 mM HCl (acidified ASA) in rats.Main methodsThe stomach was perfused with acidified ASA at a rate of 0.4 ml/min for 60 min under urethane anesthesia, and gastric bleeding was measured as the concentration of hemoglobin in the luminal perfusate, which was collected every 15 min. Clopidogrel (10–100 mg/kg), ticlopidine (10–300 mg/kg), or cilostazol (3–30 mg/kg) was given p.o. 24 h or 90 min before the perfusion of acidified ASA, respectively.Key findingsPerfusion of the stomach with acidified ASA alone led to slight bleeding and lesions in the stomach. The pretreatment with clopidogrel, even though it did not cause bleeding or damage by itself, dose-dependently increased the gastric bleeding and ulcerogenic responses induced by acidified ASA. Ticlopidine also aggravated the severity of damage by increasing gastric bleeding, and the effects of ticlopidine at 300 mg/kg were equivalent to those of clopidogrel at 100 mg/kg. In contrast, cilostazol dose-dependently decreased gastric bleeding and damage in response to acidified ASA.SignificanceThese results demonstrated that clopidogrel and ticlopidine, P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, increased gastric bleeding and ulcerogenic responses to acidified ASA, to the same extent, while cilostazol, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, suppressed these responses. Therefore, cilostazol may be safely used in dual anti-platelet therapy combined with ASA, without increasing the risk of gastric bleeding.