A comparison of the cellular actions of polaprezinc (zinc-l-carnosine) and ZnCl2

AimsZinc supplementation has been proven to be beneficial for the prevention of some health problems. Many zinc supplements are used for medical and nutritional purposes. However, it is difficult to distinguish between them in terms of their cellular actions. We compared the cellular actions of polaprezinc (zinc-l-carnosine) with those of ZnCl2 in order to determine whether polaprezinc has greater zinc-related actions than ZnCl2.Main methodsCellular actions of polaprezinc and ZnCl2 were estimated by flow-cytometric techniques with appropriate fluorescent probes in rat thymocytes.Key findingsBoth agents had almost equal stimulatory effects on the intracellular Zn2 + level and cellular level of nonprotein thiol in a similar concentration-dependent manner. However, the increase in cell lethality caused by ZnCl2 under severe oxidative stress was significantly greater than that caused by polaprezinc.SignificanceThere are various zinc supplements, for example, zinc gluconate, zinc picolinate, and zinc methionine. However, the differences in their cellular actions have not been elucidated to date. Such studies could distinguish between zinc supplements.