کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2602978 1133803 2009 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Mutagenicity of aromatic amines and amides with chemical models for cytochrome P450 in Ames assay
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم محیط زیست بهداشت، سم شناسی و جهش زایی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Mutagenicity of aromatic amines and amides with chemical models for cytochrome P450 in Ames assay
چکیده انگلیسی

Chemical models for cytochrome P450, consisting of water-insoluble or water-soluble iron porphyrin plus an oxidant, have been used to detect the mutagenicity of promutagens in genotoxicity assays. The procedure for using chemical models for cytochrome P450 as substitutes for the S9 mix in the Ames assay have been already established. Aromatic amines and amides require metabolic activation by cytochrome P450 when they exert their mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium strains. In this study, we optimized the conditions of the assay using a water-soluble chemical model, 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(1-methylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrinatoiron(III) pentachloride (4-MPy), plus tert-butyl hydroperoxide (t-BuOOH), magnesium monoperoxyphthalate, or iodosylbenzene, by comparing the mutagenicity of 2-aminofluorene (AF) in the Ames test. The model with 4-MPy/t-BuOOH showed the highest AF mutagenic potency. The chemical model activated 2-naphthylamine, 4-aminobiphenyl, and benzidine in S.typhimurium TA98. In aromatic amides, the model with 4-MPy/t-BuOOH weakly activated 2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF). To detect higher mutagenicity of aromatic amides, we used a higher concentration of 4-MPy/t-BuOOH by a factor of 5 over that used for aromatic amines, and then detected the mutagenicity of AAF, 2-acetylaminoanthracene, and 2-acetylamino-9-fluorenone. Furthermore, we concluded that the AAF mutagenicity in the presence of 4-MPy/t-BuOOH is derived from N-hydroxylacetylamino compounds.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Toxicology in Vitro - Volume 23, Issue 6, September 2009, Pages 986–991
نویسندگان
, , ,