کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
267400 | 504401 | 2012 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: A numerical model of the structural behavior of buckling-restrained braces A numerical model of the structural behavior of buckling-restrained braces](/preview/png/267400.png)
This work presents a numerical model of the cyclic structural behavior of dissipative buckling-restrained braces, commonly used as an alternative to classical concentric braces for seismic protection of building frames and other structures. Such devices are usually composed of a slender steel core embedded in a stockiest casing that is intended to prevent its buckling when it is under compression. The casing is made either of mortar or steel, and a sliding interface is interposed between the core and the casing to prevent excessive shear stress transfer. The behavior of the steel core is described by a damage and plasticity model; the behavior of the mortar casing is described by an isotropic damage model and the sliding behavior of the interface is described by a contact penalty model. These three models are implemented in the Abaqus software package following an explicit formulation. The ability of this algorithm to reproduce the cyclic behavior of buckling-restrained braces is verified in a number of representative yet simple situations. The accuracy of the proposed model is checked by comparison with experimental results; a satisfactory agreement is obtained. Preliminary conclusions are issued and further research needs are identified.
► Buckling-restrained braces have been widely used for seismic protection of buildings.
► Their structural behavior is highly complex and none accurate and reliable numerical model has been reported.
► This lack prevents the development of innovative and daring solutions.
► This paper proposes such a numerical model.
► The accuracy of the model is checked by comparison with available experimental results.
Journal: Engineering Structures - Volume 41, August 2012, Pages 108–117