کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2869433 1171245 2009 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Pourquoi je n'abandonne pas la voie fémorale !
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Pourquoi je n'abandonne pas la voie fémorale !
چکیده انگلیسی
Since its introduction in 1989, the safety of transradial approach compared to the femoral approach is mainly due to reducing entry site complications, allowing early ambulation, but at the price of a higher rate of procedural failure, arterial occlusion and radiation for operators and patients. Nevertheless, these advantages can be minimized with a modern femoral approach requiring a 4-French catheter for diagnostic angiography and a low dose heparin, new antithrombotic drugs and a reasonable use of glycoprotein (GB)IIb-IIIa for angioplasty. The radial approach is the best way to go in hemorrhagic high-risk patients and the femoral approach is safer in complex procedures. The operator has to hold the two accesses and to know when to switch to another approach to minimize complications, procedure time, radiation and contrast use.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie - Volume 58, Issue 6, December 2009, Pages 373-376
نویسندگان
, , , ,