کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2944904 | 1577116 | 2014 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
ObjectivesThe goal of this study was to investigate the differential efficacy of clopidogrel or aspirin monotherapy according to smoking status in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease.BackgroundSmoking enhances clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibition, which may explain the higher relative benefit among smokers observed in trials evaluating dual antiplatelet therapy. Whether smoking has an impact on clinical outcomes in patients requiring a single antiplatelet agent remains unknown.MethodsThis was a post-hoc analysis of the CAPRIE (Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events) trial that compared clopidogrel and aspirin monotherapy in patients (N = 19,184) with atherosclerotic vascular disease.ResultsCurrent smokers (n = 5,688) had an increased risk of ischemic events compared with never smokers (n = 4,135; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08 to 1.42]) and ex-smokers (n = 9,381; HR: 1.32 [95% CI: 1.18 to 1.47]) (p < 0.001). Clopidogrel was associated with a reduction in ischemic events among current smokers (8.3% vs. 10.8%; HR: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.64 to 0.90]), whereas no benefit over aspirin was seen in the combined group of ex-smokers/never-smoked patients (10.4% vs. 10.6%; HR: 0.99 [95% CI: 0.89 to 1.10]; p = 0.01 for interaction). Among current smokers, clopidogrel also reduced myocardial infarction, vascular death, and death from any cause compared with aspirin. No interaction between smoking status and study treatment was observed for bleeding events.ConclusionsIn a post-hoc analysis of the CAPRIE population, current smokers appeared to have enhanced benefit with clopidogrel therapy for secondary prevention compared with aspirin. These results should be considered hypothesis generating for future prospective studies assessing the impact of specific platelet-inhibiting strategies according to smoking status.
Journal: Journal of the American College of Cardiology - Volume 63, Issue 8, 4 March 2014, Pages 769–777