کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3041336 1184772 2011 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Postoperative treatment and prognosis of patients with resected single brain metastasis: How useful are established prognostic scores?
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی عصب شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Postoperative treatment and prognosis of patients with resected single brain metastasis: How useful are established prognostic scores?
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo evaluate postoperative prognosis and the performance of known prognostic scores in patients treated with surgical resection for single brain metastasis.MethodsWe evaluated prognostic factors and five previously published prognostic scores in a group of 74 patients with single brain metastasis treated with surgery with or without immediate whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT).ResultsIn multivariate analysis, good performance status, absence of extracranial metastases and primary tumor control were significantly associated with improved overall survival. Survival (median 10.8 months) was not significantly prolonged by immediate WBRT. Salvage treatment was necessary in 87% of patients without immediate WBRT. All five scores identified groups of patients with superior prognosis. The recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes, the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) score and the score developed by Rades et al. identified a poor prognosis group, but the numbers of poor prognosis patients were very small.ConclusionsRPA and GPA appear to have the most utility in delineating exceptionally good or poor prognosis patients after resection of single brain metastasis, but this finding remains to be validated in a larger study population. Identification and validation of suitable prognostic scores hopefully will guide decision making regarding local treatment of solitary brain metastasis.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery - Volume 113, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages 98–103
نویسندگان
, , , ,