کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3120656 1583286 2016 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Does the habitual mastication side impact jaw muscle activity?
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
آیا طرف جونده همیشگی بر فعالیت عضلانی فک تاثیر می‌گذارد؟
کلمات کلیدی
HMS، سمت جونده همیشگی؛ NHMS، سمت جونده غیرهمیشگی؛ WSM، سمت کار در طول جویدن؛ NWSM، طرف غيرکاري در زمان ترشحات؛ RDC، معیارهای تشخیصی پژوهش؛ الکترومغناطیس الکترومیوگرافی الکترومیوگرافی؛ عضلات فک؛ سمت جویدن
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی دندانپزشکی، جراحی دهان و پزشکی
چکیده انگلیسی


• We study masticatory muscle in non symptomatic individuals.
• Studies on preference side chewing can lead to knowledge on unilateral muscle function.
• Preference side is not relevant for healthy subjects.
• Working side is important in increasing electrical activity in masseter (more than in Temporal Muscle).

ObjectiveTo compare electrical activity in the anterior temporal and masseter muscles on the habitual (HMS) and non-habitual mastication side (NHMS), during mastication and in the mandibular postural position. In addition, the increase in electrical activity during mastication was assessed for the HMS and NHMS, analysing both working (WSM) and non-working side during mastication (NWSM).MethodsA total of 28 healthy women (18–32 years) participated in the study. They were submitted to Kazazoglu’s test to identify the HMS. Bioresearch ‘Bio EMG’ software and bipolar surface electrodes were used in the exams. The exams were conducted in the postural position and during the unilateral mastication of raisins, on both the HMS and NHMS. The working and non-working side on HMS and NHMS were assessed separately. The obtained data were then statistically analysed with SPSS 20.0, using the Paired Samples Test at a significance level of 95%.ResultsThe differences in the average EMG values between HMS and NHMS were not statistically significant in the postural position (Temporal p = 0.2; Masseter p = 0.4) or during mastication (Temporal WSM p = 0.8; Temporal NWSM p = 0.8; Masseter WSM p = 0.6; Masseter NWSM p = 0.2). Differences in the increase in electrical activity between the masseter and temporal muscles occurred on the working side, on the HMS and NHMS (p = 0.0), but not on the non-working side: HMS (p = 0.9) and NHMS (p = 0.3). The increase in electrical activity was about 35% higher in the masseter than in the temporal muscle.ConclusionsMastication side preference does not significantly impact electrical activity of the anterior temporal and masseter muscles during mastication or in postural position.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Archives of Oral Biology - Volume 67, July 2016, Pages 34–38
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,