کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3146382 1197253 2008 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The effect of several dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of adhesive resin luting cement using self-etching primer
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی دندانپزشکی، جراحی دهان و پزشکی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
The effect of several dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of adhesive resin luting cement using self-etching primer
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectivesDentin desensitizers can inhibit the bonding between dentin and resin cements. This study examined the effect of the previous application of desensitizers on the shear bond strength of one resin cement using self-etching primer to dentin.Materials and methodsOne hundred and twenty-five dentin exposed teeth were randomly assigned to four experimental groups and one control group of 25 teeth each. Four dentin desensitizers were applied to the four experimental groups, respectively. The dentin desensitizers used were SuperSeal® (Phoenix Dental, Inc., USA), MS-Coat® (Sun Medical Co. Ltd, Japan), Gluma® (Heraeus Kulzer, Germany), and Copalite Varnish® (Cooley & Cooley Ltd, USA). Panavia F (Kuraray Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) was attached to the top of each experimental and control group teeth using an Ultradent testing jig (Ultradent Product, Inc., Utah, USA), and the shear bond strength was measured using a Universal testing machine (Model 6022, Instron Co., Canton, MA, USA). The tooth surface was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-T2000, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).ResultsThe control group showed the greatest shear bond strength (14.74 MPa) followed by SuperSeal® (12.33 MPa), Gluma® (5.28 MPa), MS-Coat® (4.44 MPa) and Copalite Varnish™ (3.14 MPa). There was no significant difference in shear bond strength between the control group and the experimental group treated with Superseal®. The shear bond strength in the other experimental groups treated with Gluma®, Varnish®, and MS-Coat® was similar to each other but significantly lower than control or Superseal®. SEM showed revealed resin tags in most of the dentinal tubules in the experimental group treated with the Superseal®.ConclusionAmong the four dentin desensitizers, Superseal® was the only one that did not interfere with the process of resin bonding. The other dentin desensitizers that contained a resin ingredient interfered with resin retention.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Dentistry - Volume 36, Issue 12, December 2008, Pages 1025–1032
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,