The Victorian Major Trauma Transfer Study

AimsTo comprehensively examine the inter-hospital transfer of major trauma patients—including the reason for transfer, duration, escorts, interventions and unexpected events.MethodsThis was an detailed study of the transfer of major trauma cases in the State of Victoria, Australia, between April 16, 2003 and December 31, 2004. Twenty-three hospitals and seven transfer/retrieval services participated. Defined major trauma cases that were transferred between participating hospitals for the purpose of definitive care were eligible for enrolment. The transfer phase extended from 30 min before until 30 min after the transfer. The transferring and receiving hospitals and the transfer escorts were asked to record data on a specifically designed data collection form.ResultsA total of 451 cases were enrolled (mean Injury Severity Score 22.2). Transfers originated mainly from Regional Trauma (42.8%) and Metropolitan Trauma (31.3%) Services and most (90.5%) terminated at a Major Trauma Service. Median time from injury to arrival at the receiving hospital was 8 h 30 min. Median time from arrival at referring hospital to request for transfer was 3 h 25 min.Escorts comprised ambulance and medical/nursing staff in 67.0% and 30.4% of cases, respectively. Metropolitan retrieval services were involved in only 10% of cases. Medical escorts were mainly (62.9%) from the referring hospital and the majority of these were registrars (49.4%) and hospital medical officers (HMOs, 16.9%).Overall mortality was 6.2%. Mortality rates for cases escorted by referring hospital doctors, Mobile Intensive Care Ambulance (MICA), non-MICA and any other escorts were 14.5%, 6.0%, 2.6% and 4.3%, respectively. HMO escorts had the highest mortality risk (OR 3.67, 95%CI 1.00–13.49, p < 0.001).Mortality risk was greatest for cases that required administration of vasopressor drugs (OR 11.4, 95%CI 3.78–34.36, p < 0.001), intubation prior to arrival at the referring hospital (OR 10.36, 95%CI 3.51–30.52, p < 0.001), any interventions at the referring hospital (OR 8.3, 95%CI 3.1–22.2, p < 0.001), administration of blood at the receiving hospital (OR 4.91, 95%CI 1.5–16.1, p = 0.01), and cases using escorts from the referring hospital (OR 3.8, 95%CI 1.69–8.39, p = 0.001).ConclusionConsiderable variability in request for transfer and transfer times, transfer escorts and mortality risk exist. The single greatest issue identified that most severely injured group were escorted by the most junior doctors (HMOs) and had the highest mortality. This crucial issue must be addressed by the State Trauma System and by any redesigned retrieval service in Victoria. A detailed review of activation and responsiveness criteria and the nature of the transfer escort is indicated. The establishment of Adult Retrieval Victoria may address many of the concerns raised by this study.