کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3328666 | 1212331 | 2015 | 17 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

• We reviewed 18 clinical trials enroling 13,958 patients with colorectal cancer.
• We compared standard therapies with those therapies plus cetuximab or panitumumab.
• We assessed risk of severe diarrhea and mucositis in intervention and control groups.
• We found an increased risk in patients receiving Cetuximab or panitumumab.
• Adopting risk reduction strategies to limit impact of these AEs is needed.
The anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor monoclonal antibodies (anti-EGFR MoAbs) are beneficial in the treatment of wild type (WT) KRAS colorectal cancer, but are burdened by serious toxicities. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine incidence and relative risk (RR) of severe and life-threatening diarrhoea and mucositis in colorectal cancer patients and WT-KRAS subpopulation.PubMed and Embase were searched for trials comparing the same therapeutic regimens with or without anti-EGFR for colorectal cancer. Data on severe and life-threatening diarrhoea and mucositis were extracted from 18 studies involving 13,382 patients. Statistical analyses calculated incidence of AEs, RRs and 95% confidence intervals by using either random or fixed effects models. Patients receiving anti-EGFR MoAbs showed an increased risk of diarrhoea (RR: 1.66, CI 1.52–1.80) and mucositis (RR: 3.44, CI 2.66–4.44). The risk was similar among WT-KRAS patients. Prevention and risk reduction strategies of these AEs are mandatory to optimize clinical outcomes.
Journal: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology - Volume 96, Issue 2, November 2015, Pages 355–371