کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
339766 548113 2013 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Development of the Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases Scale (DACOBS)
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی علوم اعصاب رفتاری
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Development of the Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases Scale (DACOBS)
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveCognitive problems and biases play an important role in the development and continuation of psychosis. A self-report measure of these deficits and processes was developed (Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases Scale: DACOBS) and is evaluated in this study.MethodsAn item pool made by international experts was used to develop a self-report scale on a sample of 138 schizophrenia spectrum patients. Another sample of 71 patients was recruited to validate the subscales. A group of 186 normal control subjects was recruited to establish norms and examine discriminative validity.ResultsFactor analyses resulted in seven factors, each with six items (jumping to conclusions, belief inflexibility bias, attention for threat bias, external attribution bias, social cognition problems, subjective cognitive problems and safety behavior). All factors independently explained the variance (eigenvalues > 2) and total explained variance was 45%. Reliability was good (Cronbach's alpha = .90; split-half reliability = .92; test–retest reliability = .86). The DACOBS discriminates between schizophrenia spectrum patients and normal control subjects. Validity was affirmed for five of seven subscales. The scale ‘Subjective Cognitive problems’ was not associated with objective cognitive functioning and ‘Social cognition problems’ was not associated with the Hinting task, but with the scale measuring ideas of social reference.ConclusionsThe DACOBS scale, with seven independent subscales, is reliable and valid for use in clinical practice and research.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Schizophrenia Research - Volume 144, Issues 1–3, March 2013, Pages 63–71
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , ,