کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
346008 | 617782 | 2015 | 13 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Racial disparities in mental health service delivery among foster youth are well documented.
• Caseworkers identified why disparities in service delivery linger.
• Barriers identified at the macro level have a negative impact on organizational functioning.
• Organizational incapacity often imparts negative client-provider relationships.
• Supports at the macro, meso, and micro levels are needed to ameliorate mental health service disparities.
While the gap between need for and access to mental health services is well documented among children of color in foster care, little is known about why they are sustained. To illuminate barriers of service delivery, thirty-six caseworkers participated in one of five focus group meetings in a large urban Mid-Atlantic City. Ground Theory Methods revealed that there are barriers and facilitators at the macro, meso, and micro practice orientations. At the macro-level, development of effective practice strategies and proximity to effective services are likely to influence dissemination of effective practices. Secondly, at the meso-level, job support is needed to facilitate awareness, but for case managers to feel supported, they need effective training and opportunities to facilitate interagency collaboration. Finally, at the micro-level, cultural competence largely impacts implementation of effective practices. However, increased awareness around the social ills of stigma and the salience of “insider work” are needed to increase cultural competence. A “downstream” effect in which there are numerous barriers identified at the macro level has a direct negative impact on organizational capacity and readiness to deliver and engage youth and families in mental health services served by the child welfare system. Findings underscore the need for child welfare agencies to build supports at the macro, meso, and micro practice levels to ameliorate mental health service disparities.
Journal: Children and Youth Services Review - Volume 52, May 2015, Pages 110–122