کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
356864 1435413 2016 14 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Same difference? Understanding variation in the estimation of effect sizes from educational trials
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
اختلاف یکسان؟ درک تغییر در برآورد اثر اندازه از کارآزمایی های آموزشی
کلمات کلیدی
ارزیابی؛ اندازه اثر؛ RCT؛ مدل سازی چند سطحی؛ بیزی MLM
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی علوم اجتماعی آموزش
چکیده انگلیسی


• Analytical models should respect study designs and the nested structure of data.
• MLM with total variance should be used for cluster and multisite randomised trials.
• Models with different covariates differ in their total variances to be explained.
• Both regression models and their outcomes and covariates should be pre-specified.

By applying four analytic models with comparable outcomes and covariates to a dataset of 20 outcomes from 17 educational trials, we found results closely matching in well-powered studies without serious implementation problems. The interventions and evaluations were all funded by the Education Endowment Foundation and independently evaluated. We demonstrated that when an analysis takes little account of research design, or where there were difficulties with implementation and data collection, point estimates of effect differ and estimates of precision vary. This adds to the challenge of understanding the comparative impact of interventions and deciding which are worth scaling up.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Educational Research - Volume 77, 2016, Pages 1–14
نویسندگان
, , ,