Low tube voltage computed tomography urography using low-concentration contrast media: Comparison of image quality in conventional computed tomography urography

PurposeThe aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility and image quality of excretory CT urography performed using low iodine-concentration contrast media and low tube voltage.Materials and methodsThis prospective study enrolled 63 patients who undergoing CT urography. The subjects were randomized into two groups of an excretory phase CT urography protocol and received either 240 mg I/mL of contrast media and 80 kVp of tube voltage (low-concentration protocol, n = 32) or 350 mg I/mL and 120 kVp (conventional protocol, n = 31). Two readers qualitatively evaluated images for sharpness of the urinary tract, image noise, streak artifact and overall diagnostic acceptability. The mean attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio and figure of merit were measured in the urinary tract. The non-inferiority test assessed the diagnostic acceptability between the two protocol groups.ResultsThe low-concentration protocol showed a significantly lower effective radiation dose (3.44 vs. 5.70 mSv, P < .001). The diagnostic acceptability was significantly lower in the low-concentration protocol with iterative reconstruction algorithm than in the conventional protocol (4.06 ± 0.45 vs. 4.50 ± 0.37, P < .001), however, all subjects showed at least more than standard diagnostic acceptability and the difference resided in the predefined non-inferiority margin. The signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio and figure of merit were significantly higher in the low-concentration protocol along the entire urinary tract (P < .001).ConclusionCT urography using 240 mg I/mL iodine contrast media, 80 kVp tube voltage and an iterative reconstruction algorithm is beneficial to reduce radiation dose and iodine load, and its objective image quality and subjective diagnostic acceptability is not inferior to that of conventional CT urography.