کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4225141 | 1609755 | 2015 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• We evaluated myocardial perfusion by dual energy computed tomography (DECT).
• We included patients with intermediate to high likelihood of coronary artery disease.
• Stress myocardial perfusion by DECT had a reliable accuracy for the detection of ischemia.
• Stress myocardial perfusion with DECT showed an incremental value over anatomical evaluation.
• DECT imaging was associated to a significant reduction in radiation dose compared to SPECT.
PurposeWe sought to explore the diagnostic performance of dual energy computed tomography (DECT) for the evaluation of myocardial perfusion in patients with intermediate to high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD).Materials and methodsConsecutive patients with known or suspected CAD referred for myocardial perfusion imaging by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) constituted the study population and were scanned using a DECT scanner equipped with gemstone detectors for spectral imaging, and a SPECT. The same pharmacological stress was used for both scans.ResultsTwenty-five patients were prospectively included in the study protocol. The mean age was 63.4 ± 10.6 years. The total mean effective radiation dose was 7.5 ± 1.2 mSv with DECT and 8.2 ± 1.7 mSv with SPECT (p = 0.007). A total of 425 left ventricular segments were evaluated by DECT, showing a reliable accuracy for the detection of reversible perfusion defects [area under ROC curve (AUC) 0.84 (0.80–0.87)]. Furthermore, adding stress myocardial perfusion provided a significant incremental value over anatomical evaluation alone by computed tomography coronary angiography [AUC 0.70 (0.65–0.74), p = 0.003].ConclusionsIn this pilot investigation, stress myocardial perfusion by DECT demonstrated a significant incremental value over anatomical evaluation alone by CTCA for the detection of reversible perfusion defects.
Journal: European Journal of Radiology - Volume 84, Issue 4, April 2015, Pages 637–642