کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4225975 | 1609793 | 2012 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Potential contribution of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) to computer-aided detection of lung nodules on MDCT Potential contribution of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) to computer-aided detection of lung nodules on MDCT](/preview/png/4225975.png)
PurposeTo evaluate potential benefits of using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) in computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules on multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).Materials and methodsMDCT datasets of 60 patients with suspected lung nodules were retrospectively collected. Using “second-read” CAD, two radiologists (Readers 1 and 2) independently interpreted these datasets for the detection of non-calcified nodules (≥4 mm) with concomitant confidence rating. They did this task twice, first without MPR (using only axial images), and then 4 weeks later with MPR (using also coronal and sagittal MPR images), where the total reading time per dataset, including the time taken to assess the detection results of CAD software (CAD assessment time), was recorded. The total reading time and CAD assessment time without MPR and those with MPR were statistically compared for each reader. The radiologists’ performance for detecting nodules without MPR and the performance with MPR were compared using jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis.ResultsCompared to the CAD assessment time without MPR (mean, 69 s and 57 s for Readers 1 and 2), the CAD assessment time with MPR (mean, 46 s and 45 s for Readers 1 and 2) was significantly reduced (P < 0.001). For Reader 1, the total reading time was also significantly shorter in the case with MPR. There was no significant difference between the detection performances without MPR and with MPR.ConclusionThe use of MPR has the potential to improve the workflow in CAD of lung nodules on MDCT.
Journal: European Journal of Radiology - Volume 81, Issue 2, February 2012, Pages 366–370