کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4227164 1609813 2010 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in Burkitt's lymphoma
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی رادیولوژی و تصویربرداری
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in Burkitt's lymphoma
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo explore the value of 18F fluorodeoxy-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in Burkitt's lymphoma.MethodsAll Burkitt's lymphoma patients referred for FDG PET or FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) exams at our institution from June 2003 to June 2006 were included. Selected patients were followed and clinical information was reviewed retrospectively. Results from FDG PET–PET/CT, as blindly reviewed by a consensus of two experienced readers, were compared with the status of the disease as determined by other laboratory, clinical and imaging exams and clinical follow-up. FDG PET–PET/CT results were classified as true positive or negative and false positive or negative. The degree of FDG uptake in the positive lesions was semiquantified as maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax).ResultsFifty-seven FDG PET–PET/CT exams were done in 15 patients. Seven exams were done for initial staging, 8 during and 14 after the completion of therapy, and 28 for disease surveillance. For nodal disease FDG PET–PET/CT was true positive in 8, true negative in 47 and false positive in 2 exams (sensitivity 100%, specificity 96%). For extranodal disease FDG PET–PET/CT was true positive in 6, true negative in 48 and false positive in 3 exams (sensitivity 100%, specificity 94%). The mean SUVmax for the positive nodal lesions was 15.7 (range 6.9–21.7, median 18.5) and for extranodal lesions was 14.2 (range 6.2–24.3, median 12.4).ConclusionsFDG PET–PET/CT is sensitive for the detection of viable disease in Burkitt's lymphoma. Affected areas demonstrated high degree of uptake that was reversible upon successful implementation of treatment.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: European Journal of Radiology - Volume 75, Issue 1, July 2010, Pages e68–e73
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , ,