Power Doppler sonography: Anything to add to BI-RADS US in solid breast masses?

ObjectiveTo evaluate the contribution of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) to breast imaging reporting and data system ultrasonography (BI-RADS US) categorization of solid breast masses.Materials and methodsTotally 94 solid lesions with histopathological results in 49 patients were included in the study. US features of the lesions were classified according to American College of Radiologists (ACR) BI-RADS US lexicon. Lesions were evaluated qualitatively according to their PDUS properties and quantitatively with spectral analysis. Hypervascularity, penetration of vessels into the mass or branching-disordered course and resistivity index values higher than 0.85 were accepted as probable malignant criteria.ResultsFifty-five of 94 lesions were benign (58.5%), while 39 (41.5%) were malignant histopathologically. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of US and PDUS in the diagnosis of malignant lesions were 100%, 58.2%, 62.9%, 100% and 71.8%, 81.8%, 73.7%, 80.4%, respectively. Criteria used for the distinction of malignant and benign lesions like number of vessels (p < 0.05), distribution of tumoral vessels, morphology of vessels and resistivity index values higher than 0.85 showed statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). When sonographic findings were combined with PDUS and spectral analysis findings, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 100%, 52.7%, 60% and 100%, respectively.ConclusionPDUS and spectral analysis have no contribution to BI-RADS US. For the spectral analysis, when RI value is one or greater, malignancy risk significantly increases.