Fate and fouling characteristics of fluorescent dissolved organic matter in ultrafiltration of terrestrial humic substances

• EEM-PARAFAC is applied to track the fate of different HS constitutes in UF.
• Removal was greater for protein/tannin-like (C1) vs. humic-like components.
• Fouling behaviors of humic-like components (C2–C4) depend on their molecular sizes.
• C2 and C4 are associated with irreversible and reversible fouling, respectively.
• Large sized C4 is suggested a surrogate for predicting UF membrane fouling.

Ultrafiltration (UF) membrane fouling caused by terrestrial input of dissolved organic matter (DOM), especially during high flood periods, is poorly understood. In this study, we examined the fouling characteristics of three different terrestrial humic substances (HS) on regenerated cellulose (RC) UF membranes with the pore sizes of 30 k–3 kDa via conventional bulk HS measurements as well as an advanced fluorescence spectroscopy. The fluorescence excitation-emission matrix coupled with parallel factor analysis (EEM-PARAFAC) identified one protein-like (C1) and three humic-like fluorescent components (C2–C4) from soil and leaf-derived HS. The fate of the different fluorescent components was individually tracked for the UF processes. The higher removal rates were found generally on the order of high molecular weight (HMW) C1 to smaller sized humic-like components (C4 > C3 > C2) regardless of the HS sources, implying the importance of HS molecular sizes on the UF operation. Among the humic-like components, C2 was the most associated with irreversible fouling, while other two humic-like components contributed more to reversible fouling. For soil-derived HS, C4 can be suggested as a good surrogate for membrane fouling, as evidenced by the highest correlation between the removal rates and the total fouling indices among the tested HS variables including conventional bulk parameters. Our study demonstrated a promising application of EEM-PARAFAC for probing membrane fouling of terrestrial DOM, which provided additional insight into the fate of different fluorescent components on the UF processes.

Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide