کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4478532 1622927 2015 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Implementing deficit irrigation scheduling through plant water stress indicators in early nectarine trees
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
اجرای برنامه ریزی کم آبیاری از طریق شاخص های تنش خشکی گیاه در نهال های دریایی اولیه
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک علوم زراعت و اصلاح نباتات
چکیده انگلیسی


• LVDT sensors promoted substantial water saving during the late postharvest.
• MDS SI protocol corrections were considered necessary to improve the irrigation.
• MDS SI and Ψstem allowed us to quantify the real effect of irrigation scheduling.
• −1.5 MPa and MDS SI 1.5 can be considered as threshold values not to be exceeded.

A three-year experiment on early nectarine (Prunus persica L. Batsch cv. Flanoba) trees was carried out with the aim of increasing water use efficiency through applying a sustained irrigation treatment, in a commercial orchard in southern Spain. Experiments compared irrigation scheduling using conventional micrometeorology (110% of crop evapotranspiration, ETc) as a control treatment (TCTL), a treatment based on the normal practice of the farmer (TFARMER) and a regulated deficit irrigation treatment (TRDI), which involved irrigating the crop at the same level as the control (TCTL) during the critical periods of the first year (second rapid fruit growth period and 2 months after harvest) and at 60% TCTL during postharvest. In the last two years (2010 and 2011), the irrigation was scheduled to maintain the signal intensity (SI) of the maximum daily shrinkage of the trunk (MDS, SI = MDSTRDI/MDSTCTL) at different water stress levels depending on the phenological stage SI = 1.0 (non-water stress) and SI = 1.4 (moderate water stress). Most of the time that irrigation scheduling was based on MDS SI, this parameter varied only slightly around the pre-established threshold values. The information given by the stem diameter sensors and stem water potential (Ψstem) gave −1.5 MPa and MDS SI 1.5 as threshold values not to be exceeded during postharvest, since MDS and Ψstem SI values were only linear down to 1.5. The water saved amounted to 17, 15 and 37% of the amount used in the control in the three seasons, respectively. In contrast, the TFARMER treatment applied more water (about 20 and 5% more than TCTL) during the first 2 years, and 10% less than TCTL during the third season.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Agricultural Water Management - Volume 152, April 2015, Pages 207–216
نویسندگان
, , , ,