کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4481350 | 1623099 | 2015 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Variations in toxic and non-toxic cyanobacteria and microcystin levels were observed.
• Sankuldhara and Lakshmikund ponds were hypertrophic.
• Microcystis spp. was the dominant microcystin producer at both study sites.
• Microcystin concentrations were above WHO guidelines for all samples.
• Microcystin production was regulated by overall nutrient levels, N:P ratio, temperature and pH.
The relationship between microcystin production, microcystin-producing cyanobacteria, including Microcystis spp., and various biological and physicochemical parameters in Sankuldhara and Lakshmikund, situated in the same geographical area was studied over a period of 1.5 years. Seasonal variation in cyanobacterial 16S rRNA, Microcystis spp. 16S rRNA, mcyA and mcyB genes were quantitatively determined by real-time PCR. Microcystis was the dominant microcystin producer in both study sites constituting 67% and 97% of the total microcystin-producing cyanobacteria at Sankuldhara and Lakshmikund, respectively. Microcystin concentrations were 2.19–39.60 μg/L and 15.22–128.14 μg/L at Sankuldhara and Lakshmikund, respectively, as determined by LC-MS. Principal component analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between microcystin concentration and the copy number of mcyA and mcyB, chlorophyll a and cyanobacterial biomass at both sites. The higher microcystin concentrations in Lakshmikund pond were attributed to the high copy number of mcy genes present coupled with the pond's eutrophication status, as indicated by high total algal biomass, high chlorophyll a content, high nutrient load and low DO. Therefore, a significant difference in microcystin concentrations, correlating with these various biological and physicochemical parameters, confirms the importance of local environmental variables in the overall regulation of microcystins production.
Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (274 K)Download as PowerPoint slide
Journal: Water Research - Volume 69, 1 February 2015, Pages 131–142